Data
Every figure comes from reviewed reports, read straight from the database. Nothing here is estimated or sampled. Citizen loss and Public funds: The two money figures are always kept apart, because one is backed by receipts and the other is an estimate.
Reviewed reports
1
Citizen loss
BDT 294
Time lost
Not measured
People affected
0
Distribution by district
Both axes are logarithmic. On a linear scale one large district pushes the other 63 into the corner, and that chart hides its own data. Circle size is days lost.
What the ledger is made of
Overcharging
1
1 complaints
- Overcharging1
Not enough has been filed yet to show a share.
The whole ledger split by kind, each part carrying its own count.
By category
- Overcharging1
By division
- Chattogram1
BDT 294
- Dhaka0
- Rajshahi0
- Khulna0
- Barishal0
- Sylhet0
- Rangpur0
- Mymensingh0
Patterns that keep recurring
Each pattern below is derived statistically, not picked by hand. They come from the gap between how often two things should appear together and how often they actually do.
At least 25 reviewed reports are needed before patterns are published. On thin data the strongest-looking pattern is usually a coincidence that happened twice.
Most reported offices
More reports does not mean more corruption: bigger offices see more citizens. Compare each office by its transparency index instead. Transparency index
- Union Parishad1
BDT 294
Full list
| District | Division | Reports | Citizen loss | Time | Public funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brahmanbaria | Chattogram | 1 | BDT 294 | — | BDT 0 |